His selfish decisions lead to his own downfall in the end, despite the fact that he thinks he is trying to do good for his kingdom by taking the throne. All words are pockets into which now this, now that is put, and sometimes many things at once. Richard III himself also fits very neatly into the framework of the "tragic hero". Shakespeare inherited his concept of tragedy from ancient Greece and Rome, as well as contemporary writers that wrote just before him or simultaneously with him. Almost everyone that has a role in the play gets killed by the manipulative title character. Richard III is as tragic as a play can get. As students analyse Shakespeare tragedy, they work in groups to create their own Shakespearean tragedy - using genre conventions including themes, plot. I guess because it concerns known historical events (though who can be sure how accurate Shakespeare's telling is) it is most easily slotted into the historical plays category. It is as tragic and brutal as any of his other tragedies. I've always found it strange that Shakespeare's Richard III is only ever classified as a history play. Richard III is about an established event in English history, therefore scholastically considered a history first and a tragedy second. Shakespearean scholars tend to call the plays that concern England's royal lineage the "histories," although two, Macbeth and King Lear, are not classified as such, probably because they are based on legends rather than direct relations to the English throne. The Tragic Hero: Is an articulate, social authority Is important within his society Has at least one weakness or. Several of the history plays are certainly tragic in nature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |